Taiwan blocks Coinbase and Kalshi over illegal election betting on prediction markets
Court-authorised website blocks over election betting threaten access to prediction markets in Taiwan.
17 entries from 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-16. Open in the feed
Get it flagged in Friday’s five whenever it moves.
17
entries tracked16
04 Regulation1
01 Deals & M&ANewest first, grouped by month.
Court-authorised website blocks over election betting threaten access to prediction markets in Taiwan.
Nevada’s objection over sports event contracts and underage participation adds pressure to the debate over CFTC rules.
Nevada's chairman says any prediction-market participation makes a company ineligible for Nevada gaming, creating licensing risk for operators and suppliers working with Kalshi.
Kalshi's CEO warning of offshore relocation highlights that court rulings on state regulation will determine whether prediction markets face state gambling oversight.
Nevada has no fallback plan if the Supreme Court sides with prediction market operators, leaving its stance uncertain.
The suit contests state authority over Underdog’s prediction market and follows a ruling against Kalshi.
SEC approval of Cboe's corporate binary options opens a second regulatory route, while the Kentucky remand recommendation could expose Kalshi and Polymarket to state action.
Regulators and operators face dispute over whether sports event contracts are meaningfully different from online sports bets.
Bipartisan opposition to election betting and three-quarters calling it gambling add political pressure on prediction markets as the CFTC and states dispute authority.
The proposed swap definition and conflicting circuit rulings leave the status of event contracts and state gambling laws unsettled.
Record volume alongside 60% public opposition to election betting, state court fights and Google's Connecticut ad exclusions shows growth facing regulatory and distribution risk.
The reported public view and opposition to several types of betting inform the debate over prediction market oversight.
The CFTC rulemakings give Kalshi and sportsbooks a federal argument that their products are distinct, already cited in Kalshi's Sixth Circuit rehearing petition.
Undisclosed revenue splits and legal-cost allocation, plus tribal court challenges, leave tribes, operators and investors unable to judge the value of Kalshi's tribal partnerships.
The Supreme Court’s decision on review could affect state authority over sports-related betting contracts.
Tribes will own the apps and oversee customer services, while Kalshi supplies technology and settlement.
A Supreme Court review of Flaherty v. KalshiEx could settle sports contract jurisdiction, while the Seminole suit threatens DraftKings' combined sportsbook, casino and prediction app.