By The Weekly Edge desk ·
Nevada argued that North Carolina’s prediction market tax undermines Kalshi’s opposition to state oversight, reported by PlayUSA on 24 August 2026. The dispute concerns whether states can regulate or tax Kalshi’s event-contract operations.
The dispute concerns states’ authority to oversee and tax prediction market operators’ activities.
Request a correction / right of reply
Linked through shared companies, regulators and people, or one step further through the graph.
The partnerships give the tribes customer-facing apps while Kalshi operates the underlying exchange and settles transactions.
Four additional tribal agreements give tribes app ownership and customer management while Kalshi supplies exchange services.
Kalshi’s sponsorships expand MLB prediction market partnerships, with four new partners playing in states that prohibit sports betting.
The agreements give Kalshi advertising exposure and fan engagement opportunities across five MLB teams.
The partnerships create commercial opportunities for tribal operators while legal disputes over sports event contracts remain unresolved.
Nevada argues Kalshi’s acceptance of North Carolina’s trading revenue tax acknowledges state regulatory power and supports Nevada taxation.